By: Omar Silva – Editor/Publisher

National Perspective Belize I Digital 2026

www.nationalperspectivebz.com

Belize City: Friday 30th January 2026

Editorial

There is something deeply dishonest about how political power in Belize treats the military:

ceremonies instead of capacity, speeches instead of strategy, and faith instead of funding.

The recent change-of-command parades at the Belize Defense Force and the Belize Coast Guard were staged as moments of national pride. Uniforms pressed. Words carefully chosen. Cameras rolling.

But parades do not patrol rivers.

Ceremonies do not deter incursions.

And prayers—however sincere—do not replace helicopters, patrol craft, radar, training, logistics, or doctrine.

Political Comfort, Military Austerity

For nearly five years, the Briceño Administration has mastered a familiar Belizean tradition:

wrap neglect in patriotism and call it leadership.

The rank and file of the BDF and Coast Guard know the truth intimately:

promises of housing that produced empty lots,

education pathways announced but never institutionalized,

social security still unresolved,

rations that embarrass a nation claiming to value its defenders,

donated, aging equipment passed off as “support,”

and a defence budget that keeps soldiers disciplined—but dependent.

Yet every anniversary speech insists the forces are “strong, resilient, and ready.”

Ready for what?

Certainly not for a post-ICJ environment where sovereignty will be tested daily, not ceremonially.

The ICJ Will Not Patrol the Sarstoon

Belize’s political class behaves as though a favorable ruling from the International Court of Justice will magically resolve the realities on the ground and on the water.

It will not.

International law provides legitimacy.

Power projection—however modest—provides deterrence.

The Sarstoon River does not respond to press releases.

Territorial waters do not respect slogans.

Airspace does not defend itself because a Prime Minister recites scripture.

If Belize cannot reach, monitor, and sustain presence in its own territory, then sovereignty becomes symbolic—no matter how strong the legal case.

Recruitment Without Capability Is Institutional Self-Deception

Announcing the recruitment of 150 new soldiers while:

• air assets remain barely operable,
• maritime patrols are stretched thin,
• land mobility is constrained,
• and sustainment capacity is weak,

is not nation-building.

It is spreading scarcity thinner.

A soldier without mobility is not a defender—he is a stationary target.

A coast guard without persistent maritime awareness is not a shield—it is a reaction force arriving late.

Dependency Is a Policy Choice

Belize’s military dependency is not accidental; it is political.

Successive governments—this one included—have chosen:

• token donations over strategic procurement,
• single-pipeline training over diversified doctrine,
• foreign comfort over national autonomy.

When the same partners who provide Belize with obsolete equipment supply neighboring states with heavy hardware, Belize must ask:

Are we being supported—or managed?

A sovereign defence posture cannot be outsourced.

Faith Is Not a Defence Doctrine

It is deeply troubling that political leaders increasingly frame military leadership in terms of religiosity rather than readiness.

Faith may shape character.

It does not replace logistics.

God does not maintain helicopters.

Scripture does not fuel patrol boats.

Prayer does not train pilots, engineers, or drone operators.

A state that confuses moral virtue with military capability is not humble—it is negligent.

What Real Leadership Would Look Like

If this administration were serious, Belizeans would already see:

• a published National Defence Strategy aligned to ICJ realities,
• a Sarstoon operational protocol with clear rules of engagement,
• diversified training partnerships beyond symbolic dependence,
• investment in local military manufacturing (uniforms, boots, maintenance),
• development of organic surveillance tools, including drones,
• and a defence budget tied to measurable outcomes—not speeches.

None of this requires militarism.

It requires respect for reality.

Final Word

Belize’s servicemen and women are not asking for luxury.

They are asking for tools equal to their duty.

They cannot continue to be paraded for applause while being denied the means to defend the nation they swear to protect.

A government that celebrates soldiers while starving their institution is not patriotic.

It is performative.

And sovereignty built on performance alone collapses the moment it is tested.

You cannot defend a nation with parades.